About me
Recent comments
- lionmansfield on Trident Replacement?
- deleted user on Trident Replacement?
- lionmansfield on Trident Replacement?
- deleted user on Trident Replacement?
Search
Archives
Calendar
| Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa | Su |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 |
Recent comments (4)
In response to: "Trident Replacement?" 1209 days old
by lionmansfield [Member]
We clearly share a point of view on this at least. I would like to compare notes with you on other things.I am new to blogging. Is there some way we could set up dialogue on other topics - e.g. the Middle East? more…
In response to: "Trident Replacement?" 1210 days old
by deleted user [Visitor]
I take the Independent but will be sure to mention it.
I agree with your letter and your comment. Say Hezbollah (just as an example) sneaked a nuclear weapon into Britain. Terrible as the results would be, who would be to blame and who would we retailiate against. And why would we need submarines ? The world has moved on from the Cold more…
In response to: "Trident Replacement?" 1210 days old
by lionmansfield [Member]
Good question. By the way my blog is the text of a letter by me in today's Guardian. Tell your friends about it if you will.
My comment on your question is this. It is the USA, not Britain, which is the "Great Satan" to the Mosl;em countries whether it likes it or not. If anyone is going to come under nuclear threat it is surely them f more…
In response to: "Trident Replacement?" 1210 days old
by deleted user [Visitor]
Damn good point. Who are we supposed to be protected against with such a sophisticated deterrant. Iran ? North Korea ? more…